Moderators: Timko, Solty, Frank Delicious, Blake_T, Fritz, Booter
djalizwan wrote:Okay, here is the situation:
A player misses a mando, and gets his/her disc stuck in a tree higher than 2 meters off of the ground.
Is this only one penalty stroke because the mando was missed first, or is it two penalty strokes, and the player would be playing their fourth shot from the drop zone?
Missed the mandatory, went OB
Question: I was playing a hole with a mandatory tree ahead of the tee to the left, with an OB road running along the hole a bit further left. The mandatory is to the right side of the tree. My drive missed the tree on the left and flew another 250 feet before landing on the OB road. Where do I play my next shot?
This question was posed by Chuck Kennedy, who provided the following illustration:
Response: Applicable Rules: 803.08.Out of Bounds, 803.12 Mandatories
Missed Mando Went OB diagram803.08.E states that missing the mandatory takes precedence: E. A throw that misses a mandatory shall be penalized and the lie marked according to the mandatory rule (803.11). It will not be further penalized for any other reason, such as out-of-bounds or above two meters.
That leads to straightforward rulings in the cases illustrated above:
Shot C, route 2: The disc has not missed the mandatory because it has not crossed the mandatory line on the wrong side, therefore it is played where it was last in-bounds with a one-throw penalty.
Shot B, route 1: This shot has missed the mandatory and then gone OB. According to the rule above, missing the mandatory takes precedence. The next shot is played from the drop zone with a one-throw penalty.
Shot A, route 2: This shot is in-bounds but has missed the mandatory. The next shot is played from the drop zone with a one-throw penalty.
Shot B, route 2: This shot has missed the mandatory and gone OB. Missing the mandatory takes precedence, and the next shot is played from the drop zone with a one-throw penalty.
Conscientious TDs will of course endeavor not to place hazards (such as mandatories and OB) close to each other, and, if it becomes necessary to do so, will ensure in the players' meeting that the players understand how to play the different possible scenarios.
ChUcK wrote:What about if the disc hits a mando on a cold morning, and splits into identical halves- one half misses the mando, the other half aces?
ChUcK wrote:What about if the disc hits a mando on a cold morning, and splits into identical halves- one half misses the mando, the other half aces?
Chuck Kennedy wrote:Here's a trick set of questions:
1. Player's throw crosses the mando line on the good side, hits a tree and rolls back thru the mando and ends up on the bad side of the mando line.
2. Player's throw crosses the bad side of the mando line, hits a tree and rolls back over the line and around the mando, briefly crosses the good side of the mando line but rolls back just short of the good side of the mando.
What's the ruling in each situation?
Chuck Kennedy wrote:Here's a trick set of questions:
1. Player's throw crosses the mando line on the good side, hits a tree and rolls back thru the mando and ends up on the bad side of the mando line.
2. Player's throw crosses the bad side of the mando line, hits a tree and rolls back over the line and around the mando, briefly crosses the good side of the mando line but rolls back just short of the good side of the mando.
What's the ruling in each situation?
Chuck Kennedy wrote:Only one penalty can be assessed when there are multiple possible. The priority order is:
Missing the mando
OB
2 meter (if in effect)
Lost
Unplayable penalty can only be called after any of the penalties above are assessed if that's the situation.
Here's a trick set of questions:
1. Player's throw crosses the mando line on the good side, hits a tree and rolls back thru the mando and ends up on the bad side of the mando line.
2. Player's throw crosses the bad side of the mando line, hits a tree and rolls back over the line and around the mando, briefly crosses the good side of the mando line but rolls back just short of the good side of the mando.
What's the ruling in each situation?
tim wrote:I saw this happen a few weeks ago. The mando for a local hole is on the outside tree of a tight cluster of 5-6 trees. Disc passes the mando by an inch or two, hits the next tree in the grouping, kicks to the bad-side of the mando, rolls around and makes a full circle around the mando tree. The disc was good, but the throw was really amusing.
Only one penalty can be assessed when there are multiple possible. The priority order is:
Missing the mando
OB
2 meter (if in effect)
Lost
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest