Moderators: Timko, Solty, Frank Delicious, Blake_T, Fritz, Booter
Yehosha wrote:Considering I've never met one person that does, I highly doubt it's half. I know it's not 99% either, but the % I'm sure is very high.
juju wrote:cjskier wrote:Why would you not want to know that it REALLY weighs?
Because then I couldn't throw it if I knew it was illegal. Ignorance is bliss...
reallybadputter wrote:One of the other things to be really careful about is how accurate your scale is.
Sure, it may read to the nearest 0.1 gram... but unless you are spending a lot of money on a scale or are using a balance, they aren't that accurate at all.
Looking at scales that are available through McMaster-Carr... the generic ~$80 scales with somewhere in the 2 lb to 2 kg max range have accuracies of +/-4 or 5 grams
If you want it much more accurate than that you need to either drop $250+ or you need to be using a double or triple beam balance.
Your typical kitchen or postal scale is generally not required to be horribly accurate...
Because your scale says it is 184 does not necessarily mean that it isn't 179g
Just some food for thought...

reallybadputter wrote:One of the other things to be really careful about is how accurate your scale is.
Sure, it may read to the nearest 0.1 gram... but unless you are spending a lot of money on a scale or are using a balance, they aren't that accurate at all.
Looking at scales that are available through McMaster-Carr... the generic ~$80 scales with somewhere in the 2 lb to 2 kg max range have accuracies of +/-4 or 5 grams
If you want it much more accurate than that you need to either drop $250+ or you need to be using a double or triple beam balance.
Your typical kitchen or postal scale is generally not required to be horribly accurate...
Because your scale says it is 184 does not necessarily mean that it isn't 179g
Just some food for thought...

What is the use of having a rule that will never be enforced?
TeamTollandDG wrote:What is the use of having a rule that will never be enforced?
discspeed wrote:We're not owls
Chuck Kennedy wrote:What is the use of having a rule that will never be enforced?
Liability for one. If someone gets injured and it can be shown the disc was overweight, that puts the responsibility more on the player and the manufacturer, not the PDGA. Even more magnified in Japan where the overweight discs are illegal.
Roy wrote:If I pick off some guy walking down the fairway, am I going to do any less damage with a 150g disc?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest