Speed vs. Glide

Golf Discs, Bags, Baskets, Videos, and other Disc Golf Related Equipment

Moderators: Timko, Solty, Frank Delicious, Blake_T, Fritz, Booter

Speed vs. Glide

Postby garublador » Fri Jul 23, 2004 8:14 am

Something I've noticed is that many times people recommend the "slowest" disc that will get you to your target and not your "shortest" disc. Does that mean that, in general, people are suggesting that discs that are slower but glide better are more accurate (or have more room for error) than faster discs with less glide or is it just personal preference?
garublador
Disc Whore
 
Posts: 3459
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2004 11:37 am
Location: Urbandale, IA

Postby Blake_T » Fri Jul 23, 2004 1:24 pm

most of the time, slowest = shortest, but not always. the implication here is generally, if you can reach it with a putter, throw a putter, if you can reach it with a middie, throw a middie etc. vs. trying to throw a driver every time outside of putting range.

the thing with slow, gliding discs is that even when you are off, you are still kind of close. faster discs get bigger kicks off trees, and are much more succeptable to overthrowing, big skips, etc.
Blake_T
Super Sekret Technique Jedi
 
Posts: 5824
Joined: Mon May 31, 2004 12:44 am
Location: Minneapolis

A

Postby DiscinDeadHead » Tue Sep 14, 2004 1:46 pm

If you are overthrowing your Rocs...Throw a Wizard...
Chris Boro
~Team GDS~
DiscinDeadHead
Noob
 
Posts: 18
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 9:18 pm


Return to Equipment

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 1 guest