by jubuttib » Sun Jun 10, 2012 6:51 pm
The weight itself doesn't do all that much unless the change is more in the range of 10g than 3g, but from a theoretical point a lighter disc will always be easier to get up to speed, glide a bit better, slow down a bit faster, more susceptible to form flaws and be blown around by the wind more. The differences are very small though unless you're talking about huge weight differences. More defining is the shape of the disc, and most often you'll find that lighter discs tend to mold up differently from heavier discs (especially Parting Line Height, PLH, which is just about the most definitive difference when it comes to comparing two discs of the same mold), and there the difference doesn't have to be large. But if the shape and PLH of the disc are identical the weight makes fairly little difference, my 172g Echo Star Destroyer is just as stable as my 136g Blizzard Destroyer that has the same PLH. The Blizzard is longer though usually, since it glides much better and is easier to get up to speed.
But yeah, going from ~175g to ~165g does have a very significant effect on the flight of the disc, but the results aren't always consistent due to things other than weight affecting things more. It's still usually a good idea to throw discs that are more or less the same weight since it helps keep timing consistent.
Parks wrote:If the posts on this forum are any indication, the PD is like a Teebird with sunshine coming out of its butthole so hard that it flies faster.
ION|JOKERi|MD2|TD|PD|Sword