Moderators: Timko, Solty, Frank Delicious, Blake_T, Fritz, Booter
keltik wrote:I think ZAM had the right idea.
dgdave wrote:Listen to ZAM.
i post things at facebook.com/PostIDjsun3thousand wrote:zam is already in your pants.
Mark Ellis wrote:Myth: Climo could beat you with a trash can lid.
Truth: Climo could beat you with a trash can lid left-handed.
warobert wrote:I still prefer to object to smartphones on the rangefinding capability. If I remember the rule correctly, it doesnt matter how you are using the device, only that you are in posession of a device capable of measuring longer than 10m.
warobert wrote: If I remember the rule correctly, it doesnt matter how you are using the device, only that you are in posession of a device capable of measuring longer than 10m.
Mark Ellis wrote:Myth: Climo could beat you with a trash can lid.
Truth: Climo could beat you with a trash can lid left-handed.
Leopard wrote:1 stroke penalty according to 809.13: Feelings About Society

Leopard wrote:1 stroke penalty according to 809.13: Feelings About Society
warobert wrote:Thanks for looking up the actual text. I was too lazy to walk to my bag and get the rule book out.
So how do I know that the guy is putting his score into his phone and not checking the distance to the pin using google earth? It looks the same while standing in the fairway. Also, is their any guidance for the "director" in how to rule on multi function devices that are capable of violating 802.04 A but also could be used for non rules infringing purposes?
discspeed wrote:We're not owls
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests