Moderators: Timko, Solty, Frank Delicious, Blake_T, Fritz, Booter
keltik wrote:I think ZAM had the right idea.
dgdave wrote:Listen to ZAM.
i post things at facebook.com/PostIDjsun3thousand wrote:zam is already in your pants.
JR wrote:...mafa did a test on few discs and every disc was surprisingly gyroscopic so the differences may not be huge in trying to optimze results...
Leopard wrote:...throwing discs is the extent of my science.
DaveMac wrote:Besides all the technical mumbo-jumbo, the main reason we believe our putters are more successful is the range of grips and feels.
keltik wrote:I think ZAM had the right idea.
dgdave wrote:Listen to ZAM.
i post things at facebook.com/PostIDjsun3thousand wrote:zam is already in your pants.
Leopard wrote:Throw an Anode against a Q-Mega and tell us it's a gimmick.
Leopard wrote:You don't get a pass either, FWIW.
keltik wrote:I think ZAM had the right idea.
dgdave wrote:Listen to ZAM.
i post things at facebook.com/PostIDjsun3thousand wrote:zam is already in your pants.
Jesse B 707 wrote:Does it change flight? Yes, in a desirable way? Not for me, is it a gimmick?...kind of.
Jesse B 707 wrote:Does it change flight? Yes, in a desirable way? Not for me, is it a gimmick?...kind of.
I'll add consistency to that list. I've never seen discs molded as consistently as MVP does, though even they are not perfect.AcesAZ wrote:I agree about throwing the discs. Only thing that matters is if you see an improvement or not. Ive got an Anode, Ion and several other putters. To me the best thing about the Anode is the grip, it just fits my grip perfectly. Personally for me, rim design (grip), plastic type/stiffness and weight are far more important then any gyro effect.
Small bead Aviar in Champ.JHern wrote:No idea about the Q-Mega...first I've heard of it.Leopard wrote:Throw an Anode against a Q-Mega and tell us it's a gimmick.
ION|JOKERi|MD2|TD|PD|SwordParks wrote:If the posts on this forum are any indication, the PD is like a Teebird with sunshine coming out of its butthole so hard that it flies faster.
JHern wrote:I just want to say that I'm going to be skeptical of all these kinds of claims, and challenge them with physics if I think they're suspect, because I care about disc golf too much to allow it to go the way of ball golf-like gimmicks. Seriously, have you guys seen all the ridiculous gimmicks in ball golf? I hate that crap.
discspeed wrote:Jesse B 707 wrote:Does it change flight? Yes, in a desirable way? Not for me, is it a gimmick?...kind of.
Then I trust a Wizard doesn't fly better than an Aviar-X in a desirable (flies farther, truer, with less effort) for you? Was the Wizard a gimmick?
I'm with Leopard...If you can't throw a Qmega next to an Anode and observe the differences(the Anode flies truer/farther/easier) I don't know what to say...And when a disc comes out with a very radical design and flies better than similar discs without the radical design, it probably has at least something to do with the design.
Jesse B 707 wrote:I also think a qmega is a shitty disc to compare to, there are no putters in champ plastic that fly far or glide well with anything but maximum effort.
keltik wrote:I think ZAM had the right idea.
dgdave wrote:Listen to ZAM.
i post things at facebook.com/PostIDjsun3thousand wrote:zam is already in your pants.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests