Evidence is mounting.discspeed wrote:^^^^This is what the guys at MVP told me when I showed them my big D cfr PD and the Z NukeOS...They said both discs looked like they cooled in the mold.
Moderators: Timko, Solty, Frank Delicious, Blake_T, Fritz, Booter
Evidence is mounting.discspeed wrote:^^^^This is what the guys at MVP told me when I showed them my big D cfr PD and the Z NukeOS...They said both discs looked like they cooled in the mold.
ION|JOKERi|MD2|TD|PD|SwordParks wrote:If the posts on this forum are any indication, the PD is like a Teebird with sunshine coming out of its butthole so hard that it flies faster.
JHern wrote:keltik wrote:...If you have access to SolidWorks you can do a mold flow analysis on the tooling itself.
I don't have access to the mold. I would only model a generic putter, a generic mid-range, and a generic driver. I would make up the shape, based on typical forms of each variety. Maybe I would pick a few from the Discraft profiles posted on their website.keltik wrote:I think you would have to know the exact chemistry of the plastic to do a thermal expansion analysis. and for that you would probably need a mass spectrometer. and then you'd still need to know the molecular structure of the compound in both its fluid and solid states. Then you could possibly say how the atoms/molecules reorganize themselves after a thermal event.
The point isn't to simulate the process, rather, the idea is to model the process. There's a difference. In modeling, I would vary 3 parameters: the total thermal expansion/contraction (expansivity times temperature change, a dimensionless parameter), and a suitable pair of elastic parameters (e.g., the bulk and shear moduli). I would step through combinations of these parameters over the range of variation exhibited by all plastic types, and I would use the results to find out how PLH, dome, etc., varies systematically as these physical parameters are varied. The results could later be applied to any particular plastic, by simply looking at the portion of parameter space that is relevant to that plastic.
keltik wrote:JHern wrote:...The point isn't to simulate the process, rather, the idea is to model the process...
...you'd still have to do your own measuring to make sure the scale is right...or if I have time at work I could mock up what I think the mold pieces could look like and send you a STEP file. if you want...
JHern wrote:jubuttib wrote:.... Iiiiiiinteresting... This could actually be a plausible explanation to why so many of Innova's CFR runs are A) more consistent and B) more overstable (not all, but many), and production runs are A) all over the place and B) on average less stable. If they're pushing them out for a big production run they don't have any extra time to let the discs cool in the mold, whereas when doing a smaller run for CFR they can be more careful and let the discs sit a bit longer...JHern wrote:I talked to some guys who used to mold discs for Innova...
Just a thought, purely hypothetical.
Makes perfect sense to me. I'll see these guys again tomorrow, I'll ask them...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests